That's what don the moron is calling China most of the time.

I am mocking the whole point of having "guardrails" that normalize crap just because it is noisy enough to be noticed instead of trying to at least provide an objective, reality-based evaluation of those "opinions" and heavily discount the bullshit.

So yeah, we agree, I guess.

Your incessant "ginar-ginar-ginar" vitriol is as dumb as it is annoying.

Literally all US vendors in one voice and independently of any China are calling for a "slowdown".

Do you thing every huge business with tens or even hundreds of billions is in the pocket of China and doing their bidding against its own business model?

You are not thinking your talking points through, that much is certain.

The "guardrails" and the filters assume no such thing. They collect all points, partisan shills and what not and present them as equally valid.

On *any* topic.

Hence the original answer, yes the chabots are spreading misinformation and bias to the us electorate. Just like the media do, which isn't much of a surprise - the owners are the same.

All online services from the US work in exactly the same way, they check your input for triggers and either block them or rewrite them for fox-news style "neutrality" before they pass them to the LLM, and then they check the output and edit it further.

Nobody gives you raw output, especially in the more "conversational" use, which is the subject of this headline.

Or in any other way they like, hence the quotes around it.

This is what they call it, not me.

From the horse's mouth:

Here what I call a "first response" is a response to a user input that isn't conditioned by additional requests for clarification, prompting and so on.

What it amounts to is roughly the "fair and balanced" of the Faux News and similar.

And I forgot to add: this is the "benign" default, before any manipulation that a paying customer has requested is applied to the output.

all online "ai" operates under strict "neutrality" rules, which normalize all opinions on a subject without regard to whether there is any objective reality behind them. moreover, the opinions of the provider and the government are amplified, whereas anything else is downplayed.

but if you expect a reality-based answer from a text generator whose training you know nothing about as the reality, perhaps you're the problem and should be disqualified from voting.

Nice goalpost shift from your initial claim, and answering to your sock puppet, too.

Sorry, but you actually claimed that

and this claim was decisively shown to be incorrect. The model knows about the events of Tiananmen and other historical facts inconvenient for the CCP's "doctrine and revisionist history", so the training isn't "handicapped".

But you trumptards can't admit you don't know what you're talking about even when you're shown totally wrong :)))

That many years ago was the shitcoin revolution though.

I've not even fixed my leaking roof yet, you insensitive Claude!

Oh, please. The whole "AI rivalyushon" has only been with us for "3 to 4 years" (since December 2022, when chatgpt launched), and the datacenter gold rush started in late 2024, so we're not even 2 years into it.

Nobody has been in operation for 3 years yet to "pay off the silicon" even by your yardstick, it is all crazy projections based on daydreaming.

The resource misallocation failure that is the "AI" bubble is the most stupid thing that the "huge manatee" could have done and because of the moronic "look ma, no controls" government in the trumpistan when it hits it will be worse than 1929.

LOL, really now?

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimgur.com%2Fa%2FO6OIb1z

Here is the model used, as you can observe, it isn't "uncensored", "ablated" or whatever, just an 8-bit quanitzed version of the original.

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhuggingface.co%2Funsloth...

It answers are quite close to what you'd expect from a Western model. Here is, for example, Google's Gemini answering exactly the same question:

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimgur.com%2Fa%2FMoJfxLM

The new, huge models have fewer data to train on, they aren't magically turning into "AGI", and they likely show radically diminishing returns.

So, in order not to burst the bubble the AI cartel does what?

Yep, pretends there is a legitimate reason to "slow down".

Transparent and dumb, but expect the invested in the bubble to swallow it wholesale.